H.R. 800 - Firearms Manufacturers Protection bill
It is important to note that groups such as the Brady Campaign post outright lies on their sites about this legislation. Here is an example of a Brady Campaign lie meant to deceive the public (see link above):
Here's an excerpt from H.R. 800, proving that the legislation does not give "sweeping legal immunity...":"Despite the efforts of our Senate allies, a majority in the United States Senate, eager to accommodate the wishes of NRA and gun corporation lobbyists, voted recently to strip the legal rights of victims of gun violence and give sweeping legal immunity to reckless and unsavory gun dealers"
There are many more cases spelled out in the bill that allow the industry to be sued. All you have to do is read the bill and you will realize that it is not giving the industry immunity from breaking the law (eg. knowingly selling firearms to criminals), liability stemming from defective products, or other similar instances."The term qualified civil liability action...shall not include...an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product..."
The Senate version of this bill has a provision to make the purchase of a gun lock mandatory when purchasing a handgun. What's the problem with this? Two things:
- It is basically a "tax" on purchasers of handguns, but more importantly,
- If it passes, I predict the next bill will make it a felony to not use the gun lock.
And where does this leave the people who need a handgun at their ready disposal to protect their home and family? Fumbling for a key while the burglar has his/her way....
CALL YOUR REPS TODAY and urge them to pass the House bill, H.R. 800, not the Senate version.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment |
<< Home